<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
  <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="sa-render.xsl"?>
  <update from="huaweicloud.com" type="security" status="stable" version="1">
    <id>HCE3-SA-2025-0153</id>
    <title>An update for shim is now available for HCE 3.0</title>
    <severity>Critical</severity>
    <release>HCE 3.0</release>
    <issued date="2025-10-09 06:38:18"/>
    <updated date="2025-10-09 06:38:18"/>
    <references>
      <reference href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40549" id="CVE-2023-40549" title="CVE-2023-40549 Base Score: 6.2 Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H" type="cve"/>
      <reference href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0465" id="CVE-2023-0465" title="CVE-2023-0465 Base Score: 5.3 Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N" type="cve"/>
      <reference href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40551" id="CVE-2023-40551" title="CVE-2023-40551 Base Score: 5.1 Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H" type="cve"/>
      <reference href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2650" id="CVE-2023-2650" title="CVE-2023-2650 Base Score: 7.5 Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H" type="cve"/>
      <reference href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-28737" id="CVE-2022-28737" title="CVE-2022-28737 Base Score: 7.8 Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H" type="cve"/>
      <reference href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0727" id="CVE-2024-0727" title="CVE-2024-0727 Base Score: 5.5 Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H" type="cve"/>
      <reference href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-3446" id="CVE-2023-3446" title="CVE-2023-3446 Base Score: 5.3 Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L" type="cve"/>
      <reference href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0464" id="CVE-2023-0464" title="CVE-2023-0464 Base Score: 7.5 Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H" type="cve"/>
      <reference href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40548" id="CVE-2023-40548" title="CVE-2023-40548 Base Score: 4.9 Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L" type="cve"/>
      <reference href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40547" id="CVE-2023-40547" title="CVE-2023-40547 Base Score: 9.8 Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H" type="cve"/>
      <reference href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40546" id="CVE-2023-40546" title="CVE-2023-40546 Base Score: 5.5 Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L" type="cve"/>
      <reference href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40550" id="CVE-2023-40550" title="CVE-2023-40550 Base Score: 5.5 Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N" type="cve"/>
    </references>
    <description>Security Fix(es):

An out-of-bounds read flaw was found in Shim due to the lack of proper boundary verification during the load of a PE binary. This flaw allows an attacker to load a crafted PE binary, triggering the issue and crashing Shim, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2023-40549)

Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be
vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.

Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by
OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.
A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies
in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.

Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing
the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the
`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. (CVE-2023-0465)

A flaw was found in the MZ binary format in Shim. An out-of-bounds read may occur, leading to a crash or possible exposure of sensitive data during the system's boot phase. (CVE-2023-40551)

Issue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or
data containing them may be very slow.

Impact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of
the OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message
size limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those
messages, which may lead to a Denial of Service.

An OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers -
most of which have no size limit.  OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate
an ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL
type ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the
sub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by
periods.

When one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large
(these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds
of KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long
time.  The time complexity is O(n^2) with 'n' being the size of the
sub-identifiers in bytes (*).

With OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names /
identifiers in string form was introduced.  This includes using OBJECT
IDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching
algorithms.

Such OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure
AlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify
what cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or
decrypt, or digest passed data.

Applications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are
affected, with any version of OpenSSL.  If the use is for the mere purpose
of display, the severity is considered low.

In OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME,
CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS.  It also impacts anything that processes X.509
certificates, including simple things like verifying its signature.

The impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a
100KiB limit on the peer's certificate chain.  Additionally, this only
impacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client
authentication.

In OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects,
such as X.509 certificates.  This is assumed to not happen in such a way
that it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered
not affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern,
and the severity is therefore considered low. (CVE-2023-2650)

There_x27;s a possible overflow in handle_image() when shim tries to load and execute crafted EFI executables; The handle_image() function takes into account the SizeOfRawData field from each section to be loaded. An attacker can leverage this to perform out-of-bound writes into memory. Arbitrary code execution is not discarded in such scenario. (CVE-2022-28737)

Issue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL
to crash leading to a potential Denial of Service attack

Impact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from untrusted
sources might terminate abruptly.

A file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and may come from an
untrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but
OpenSSL does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer
dereference that results in OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12
files from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs then that application will
be vulnerable to this issue.

OpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are: PKCS12_parse(),
PKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes()
and PKCS12_newpass().

We have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this
function is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant.

The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2024-0727)

Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.

Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()
or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long
delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained
from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.

The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those
checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too large. Trying to use
a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which
is over 10,000 bits in length.

However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters
that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value
even if it has already been found to be too large.

An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained
from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.

The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.
An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.
The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and
EVP_PKEY_param_check().

Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications
when using the '-check' option.

The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2023-3446)

A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack on affected systems. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. (CVE-2023-0464)

A buffer overflow was found in Shim in the 32-bit system. The overflow happens due to an addition operation involving a user-controlled value parsed from the PE binary being used by Shim. This value is further used for memory allocation operations, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow. This flaw causes memory corruption and can lead to a crash or data integrity issues during the boot phase. (CVE-2023-40548)

A remote code execution vulnerability was found in Shim. The Shim boot support trusts attacker-controlled values when parsing an HTTP response. This flaw allows an attacker to craft a specific malicious HTTP request, leading to a completely controlled out-of-bounds write primitive and complete system compromise. (CVE-2023-40547)

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in rhboot shim up to 15.7 on ARM. This affects the function mirror_one_esl of the file mok.c of the component mok. Applying the patch 66e6579dbf921152f647a0c16da1d3b2f40861ca is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at github.com. (CVE-2023-40546)

An out-of-bounds read flaw was found in Shim when it tried to validate the SBAT information. This issue may expose sensitive data during the system's boot phase. (CVE-2023-40550)
</description>
    <pkglist>
      <collection short="HCE 3.0" package="shim">
        <name>HCE 3.0</name>
        <package arch="x86_64" name="shim" version="15.7" release="15.r4.hce3">
          <filename>shim-15.7-15.r4.hce3.x86_64.rpm</filename>
        </package>
        <package arch="aarch64" name="shim" version="15.7" release="15.r4.hce3">
          <filename>shim-15.7-15.r4.hce3.aarch64.rpm</filename>
        </package>
        <package arch="aarch64" name="shim-aa64-storage" version="15.7" release="15.r4.hce3">
          <filename>shim-aa64-storage-15.7-15.r4.hce3.aarch64.rpm</filename>
        </package>
      </collection>
    </pkglist>
  </update>
