An update for edk2 is now available for HCE 2.0 Security Advisory hws_security@huawei.com Huawei Cloud HCE2-SA-2024-0273 Final 1.0 1.0 2024-11-19T07:40:47:00Z current version 2024-11-19T07:40:47:00Z 2024-11-19T07:40:47:00Z HCE SA Engine 1.0.0 An update for edk2 is now available for HCE 2.0 HCE Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Critical.A Common Vunlnerability Scoring System(CVSS)base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVElink(s) in the References section. Security Fix(es): EDK2_x27;s Network Package is susceptible to a predictable TCP Initial Sequence Number. This vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker to gain unauthorized access and potentially lead to a loss of Confidentiality. (CVE-2023-45236) EDK2 contains a vulnerability in the PeCoffLoaderRelocateImage(). An Attacker may cause memory corruption due to an overflow via an adjacent network. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to a loss of Confidentiality, Integrity, and/or Availability. (CVE-2024-38796) ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL_x27;s own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y). (CVE-2021-3712) Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available. (CVE-2024-5535) EDK2_x27;s Network Package is susceptible to a predictable TCP Initial Sequence Number. This vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker to gain unauthorized access and potentially lead to a loss of Confidentiality. (CVE-2023-45237) Issue summary: Some non-default TLS server configurations can cause unbounded memory growth when processing TLSv1.3 sessions Impact summary: An attacker may exploit certain server configurations to trigger unbounded memory growth that would lead to a Denial of Service This problem can occur in TLSv1.3 if the non-default SSL_OP_NO_TICKET option is being used (but not if early_data support is also configured and the default anti-replay protection is in use). In this case, under certain conditions, the session cache can get into an incorrect state and it will fail to flush properly as it fills. The session cache will continue to grow in an unbounded manner. A malicious client could deliberately create the scenario for this failure to force a Denial of Service. It may also happen by accident in normal operation. This issue only affects TLS servers supporting TLSv1.3. It does not affect TLS clients. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is also not affected by this issue. (CVE-2024-2511) EDK2 contains a vulnerability when S3 sleep is activated where an Attacker may cause a Division-By-Zero due to a UNIT32 overflow via local access. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to a loss of Availability. (CVE-2024-1298) The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters. Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the certificate signature, any process that parses an externally supplied certificate may thus be subject to a denial of service attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted private keys as they can contain explicit elliptic curve parameters. Thus vulnerable situations include: - TLS clients consuming server certificates - TLS servers consuming client certificates - Hosting providers taking certificates or private keys from customers - Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from subscribers - Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters Also any other applications that use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS issue. In the OpenSSL 1.0.2 version the public key is not parsed during initial parsing of the certificate which makes it slightly harder to trigger the infinite loop. However any operation which requires the public key from the certificate will trigger the infinite loop. In particular the attacker can use a self-signed certificate to trigger the loop during verification of the certificate signature. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1n and 3.0.2 on the 15th March 2022. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.2 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1n (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1m). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zd (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zc). (CVE-2022-0778) This document is provided on an "AS IS" basis and does not implyany kind of guarantee or warranty, either express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no eventshall Huawei or any of its directly or indirectly controlled subsidiaries or its suppliers be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages. Your use of the document, by any means, is totally at your own risk. Huawei is entitled to amend or update this document from time to time. The information and data embodied in this document and any attachment are strictly confidential information of Huawei and are supplied on the understanding that they will be held confidentially and not disclosed to third parties without the prior written consent of Huawei. Use all reasonable efforts to protect the confidentiality of information. In particular, do not directly or indirectly disclose, allow access to, transmit or transfer information to a third party without our prior written consent. Thank you for your co-operation. Receipt of this security advisory shall be deemed as your consent of the terms and conditions above. Huawei Cloud EulerOS 2.0 edk2 This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2023-45236 CVE-2023-45236 HCE 2.0:edk2-202011-16.r6.hce2 For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2023-45236 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-38796 CVE-2024-38796 HCE 2.0:edk2-202011-16.r6.hce2 For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-38796 5.9 CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2021-3712 CVE-2021-3712 HCE 2.0:edk2-202011-16.r6.hce2 For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2021-3712 7.4 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-5535 CVE-2024-5535 HCE 2.0:edk2-202011-16.r6.hce2 For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-5535 9.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2023-45237 CVE-2023-45237 HCE 2.0:edk2-202011-16.r6.hce2 For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2023-45237 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-2511 CVE-2024-2511 HCE 2.0:edk2-202011-16.r6.hce2 For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-2511 5.9 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-1298 CVE-2024-1298 HCE 2.0:edk2-202011-16.r6.hce2 For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-1298 6.0 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2022-0778 CVE-2022-0778 HCE 2.0:edk2-202011-16.r6.hce2 For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2022-0778 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H