An update for openssl is now available for HCE 1.1 Security Advisory hws_security@huawei.com Huawei Cloud HCE1-SA-2023-0060 Final 1.0 1.0 2023-01-05T02:56:01:00Z current version 2023-01-05T02:56:01:00Z 2023-01-05T02:56:01:00Z HCE SA Engine 1.0.0 An update for openssl is now available for HCE 1.1 HCE Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Critical.A Common Vunlnerability Scoring System(CVSS)base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVElink(s) in the References section. Security Fix(es): The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd). (CVE-2022-1292) Normally in OpenSSL EC groups always have a co-factor present and this is used in side channel resistant code paths. However, in some cases, it is possible to construct a group using explicit parameters (instead of using a named curve). In those cases it is possible that such a group does not have the cofactor present. This can occur even where all the parameters match a known named curve. If such a curve is used then OpenSSL falls back to non-side channel resistant code paths which may result in full key recovery during an ECDSA signature operation. In order to be vulnerable an attacker would have to have the ability to time the creation of a large number of signatures where explicit parameters with no co-factor present are in use by an application using libcrypto. For the avoidance of doubt libssl is not vulnerable because explicit parameters are never used. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s). (CVE-2019-1547) In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze). (CVE-2022-2068) OpenSSL has internal defaults for a directory tree where it can find a configuration file as well as certificates used for verification in TLS. This directory is most commonly referred to as OPENSSLDIR, and is configurable with the --prefix / --openssldir configuration options. For OpenSSL versions 1.1.0 and 1.1.1, the mingw configuration targets assume that resulting programs and libraries are installed in a Unix-like environment and the default prefix for program installation as well as for OPENSSLDIR should be '/usr/local'. However, mingw programs are Windows programs, and as such, find themselves looking at sub-directories of 'C:/usr/local', which may be world writable, which enables untrusted users to modify OpenSSL's default configuration, insert CA certificates, modify (or even replace) existing engine modules, etc. For OpenSSL 1.0.2, '/usr/local/ssl' is used as default for OPENSSLDIR on all Unix and Windows targets, including Visual C builds. However, some build instructions for the diverse Windows targets on 1.0.2 encourage you to specify your own --prefix. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1, 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 are affected by this issue. Due to the limited scope of affected deployments this has been assessed as low severity and therefore we are not creating new releases at this time. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s). (CVE-2019-1552) In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very large number of messages to be decrypted, can recover a CMS/PKCS7 transported encryption key or decrypt any RSA encrypted message that was encrypted with the public RSA key, using a Bleichenbacher padding oracle attack. Applications are not affected if they use a certificate together with the private RSA key to the CMS_decrypt or PKCS7_decrypt functions to select the correct recipient info to decrypt. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s). (CVE-2019-1563) There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t). (CVE-2019-1551) This document is provided on an "AS IS" basis and does not implyany kind of guarantee or warranty, either express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no eventshall Huawei or any of its directly or indirectly controlled subsidiaries or its suppliers be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages. Your use of the document, by any means, is totally at your own risk. Huawei is entitled to amend or update this document from time to time. The information and data embodied in this document and any attachment are strictly confidential information of Huawei and are supplied on the understanding that they will be held confidentially and not disclosed to third parties without the prior written consent of Huawei. Use all reasonable efforts to protect the confidentiality of information. In particular, do not directly or indirectly disclose, allow access to, transmit or transfer information to a third party without our prior written consent. Thank you for your co-operation. Receipt of this security advisory shall be deemed as your consent of the terms and conditions above. Huawei Cloud EulerOS 1.1 openssl This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2022-1292 CVE-2022-1292 HCE 1.1:openssl-1.0.2k-26.hce1c For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2022-1292 9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1547 CVE-2019-1547 HCE 1.1:openssl-1.0.2k-26.hce1c For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1547 4.7 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2022-2068 CVE-2022-2068 HCE 1.1:openssl-1.0.2k-26.hce1c For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2022-2068 9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1552 CVE-2019-1552 HCE 1.1:openssl-1.0.2k-26.hce1c For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1552 3.3 CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1563 CVE-2019-1563 HCE 1.1:openssl-1.0.2k-26.hce1c For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1563 3.7 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N This vulnerability can be exploited only when the following conditions are present: None Vulnerability details: For technical details, customers are advised to reference the website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1551 CVE-2019-1551 HCE 1.1:openssl-1.0.2k-26.hce1c For technical details, customers are advised to referencethe website: https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1551 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N